1. Marcus, M.A., Burnham, T.C., Stephens, D.W., & Dunlap, A.S. 2017. Experimental evolution of color preference for oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of BioEconomicshttp://rdcu.be/zWFJ
  2. Dunlap A.S., Papaj D.R., & Dornhaus A. 2017. Sampling and tracking a changing environment: persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees. Interface Focus 7: 20160149. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0149
  3. Stephens, D.W. and Dunlap, A.S. 2017. Foraging. In: Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, ed. 2. Byrne, J. Menzel, R. et al (Eds.), Oxford: Elsevier.
  4. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2016. Reliability, uncertainty, and costs in the evolution of animal learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 12:73-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.010
  5. Dunlap, A.S., Nielsen, M.E. Dornhaus, A., & Papaj, D.R. 2016. Foraging bumble bees weigh the reliability of personal and social information. Current Biology 26: 1195-1199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.009
  6. Burnham, T.C, Dunlap, A.S., & Stephens, D.W. 2015. Experimental evolution and economics. Sage OPEN Oct-Dec: 1-17. DOI: 10.1177/2158244015612524
  7. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2014. Experimental evolution of prepared learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(32):11750-11755. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404176111
  8. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2012. Tracking a changing environment: optimal sampling, adaptive memory, and overnight effects. Behavioral Processes 89:86-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.10.005
  9. Stephens, D. W. & Dunlap, A.S. 2011. Patch exploitation as choice: Symmetric choice in an asymmetric situation? Animal Behaviour 81:683-689. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.12.007
  10. Dunlap, A.S., MacCormick, H., McLinn, C.M., Scott, M. and Kerr, B. 2009. Why some memories do not last a lifetime: optimal long-term recall in changing environments. Behavioral Ecology 20: 1096-1105.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp102
  11. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2009. Components of change in the evolution of learning and non-learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 276: 3201-3208. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0602
  12. Stephens, D.W. & Dunlap, A.S. 2009. Why do animals make better choices in patch-leaving problems? Behavioral Processes 80: 252-260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.014
  13. Stephens, D.W. and Dunlap, A.S. 2008. Foraging. In: Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. Byrne, J. Menzel, R. et al (Eds.), Oxford: Elsevier Ltd. pp 365-383.
  14. Henly, S., Ostdiek, A., Blackwell, E., Knutie, S., Dunlap, A.S., and Stephens, D.W. 2008. The discounting-by-interruptions hypothesis: model and experiment. Behavioral Ecology 19:154-162. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm110
  15. Dunlap, A.S., Chen, B., Bednekoff, P., Greene, T., and Balda, R.P. 2006. A state dependent sex difference in spatial memory in pinyon jays (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus): mated females forget as predicted by natural history. Animal Behaviour 72: 401-411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.015
  16. Mech, S.G., Dunlap, A.S., and Wolff, J.O. 2003. Female prairie voles do not choose males based on their frequency of scent marking. Behavioral Processes 61: 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00128-6
  17. Wolff, J.O., Mech, S.G., Dunlap, A.S., and Hodges, K.E. 2002. Multi-male mating by paired and unpaired female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behaviour 139: 1147-1160. DOI: 10.1163/15685390260437308
  18. Wolff, J.O. and Dunlap, A.S. 2002. Multiple male mating, probability of conception, and litter size in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Behavioral Processes 58: 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00022-0
  19. Wolff, J.O., Dunlap, A.S., and Ritchart, E. 2001. Female prairie voles and meadow voles do not suppress reproduction in their daughters. Behavioral Processes 55: 157-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00176-0