1. Figueiredo Dexheimer, A., Outomuro D., Dunlap, A.S., & Morehouse, N. 2023. Spectral sensitivities of the orchid bee Euglossa dilemma. Journal of Insect Physiology 144:104464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsphys.2022.104464
  2. Austin, M.A., & Dunlap, A.S. 2023. Resource availability affects seasonal trajectories of population-level learning. The American Naturalist, (202)1:16-37. https://doi.org/10.1086/722235
  3. Brant, R.A., Arduser, M. & Dunlap, A.S. 2022. There must bee a better way: A review of published urban bee research and an outline of topics for future study. Landscape and Urban Planning 226:104513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104513
  4. Abts, B.J. & Dunlap, A.S. 2022. Memory and the value of social information in foraging bumble bees. Learning & Behavior 50:317–328. https://doi/org/10.3758/s13420-022-00528-2
  5. Dunlap, A.S., & Dexheimer, A.F. 2022 Experimental evolution and mechanisms for prepared learning. In M.A. Krause, K.L. Hollis, & M.R. Papini (Eds.). Evolution of learning and memory mechanisms. Cambridge University Press.
  6. Austin, M.A., Tripodi, A. Strange, J. & Dunlap, A.S. 2022. Bumble bees exhibit body size clines across an urban gradient despite low genetic differentiation. Scientific Reports 12:4166. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08093-4
  7. Austin, M.A., Manning, T.H., MuseMorris, K. & Dunlap, A.S. 2021. Equivalent learning, but unequal participation: male bumble bees learn comparably to females, but participate in cognitive assessments at lower rates. Behavioural Processes 193:104528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2021.104528
  8. Hughes, M., Bertram, S., Young, A. M., Merry, J. W., Kolluru, G., Dunlap, A. S., M., Danielson-Francois, A, & Weiss, S. 2020. Teaching animal behavior online: a primer for the pandemic and beyond. Ethology 127:14-31. https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.13096 and a longer version can be found at https://ecoevorxiv.org/64y25/
  9. Austin, M.W. & Dunlap, A.S. 2019. Intraspecific variation in worker body size makes North American bumble bees (Bombus spp.) more susceptible to decline. The American Naturalist 194(3): https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/pdfplus/10.1086/704280
  10. Austin, M.W., Horack, P. & Dunlap, A.S. 2019. Choice in a floral marketplace: the role of complexity in bumble bee decision-making. Behavioral Ecology 30(2): 500-508. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary190
  11. Maharaj, G., Horack, P., Yoder, M. & Dunlap, A.S. 2019. Influence of pre-existing preference for color on sampling and tracking behavior in bumble bees. Behavioral Ecology 30(1): 150-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ary140
  12. Dunlap, A.S., Austin, M.W., & Figueiredo, A. 2019. Components of change and the evolution of learning in theory and experiment. Animal Behaviour 147:157-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.05.024
  13. Marcus, M.A., Burnham, T.C., Stephens, D.W., & Dunlap, A.S. 2018. Experimental evolution of color preference for oviposition in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of BioEconomics. 20(1): 125-140.  http://rdcu.be/zWFJ
  14. Dunlap, A.S. 2018. Biological preparedness. Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior. J. Vonk, T.K. Shackleford, Eds.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1301-1
  15. Dunlap A.S., Papaj D.R., & Dornhaus A. 2017. Sampling and tracking a changing environment: persistence and reward in the foraging decisions of bumblebees. Interface Focus 7: 20160149. DOI: 10.1098/rsfs.2016.0149
  16. Stephens, D.W. and Dunlap, A.S. 2017. Foraging. In: Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference, ed. 2. Byrne, J. Menzel, R. et al (Eds.), Oxford: Elsevier.
  17. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2016. Reliability, uncertainty, and costs in the evolution of animal learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 12:73-79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2016.09.010
  18. Dunlap, A.S., Nielsen, M.E. Dornhaus, A., & Papaj, D.R. 2016. Foraging bumble bees weigh the reliability of personal and social information. Current Biology 26: 1195-1199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2016.03.009
  19. Burnham, T.C, Dunlap, A.S., & Stephens, D.W. 2015. Experimental evolution and economics. Sage OPEN Oct-Dec: 1-17.  DOI: 10.1177/2158244015612524
  20. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2014. Experimental evolution of prepared learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(32):11750-11755.  DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1404176111
  21. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2012. Tracking a changing environment: optimal sampling, adaptive memory, and overnight effects. Behavioral Processes 89:86-94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2011.10.005
  22. Stephens, D. W. & Dunlap, A.S. 2011. Patch exploitation as choice: Symmetric choice in an asymmetric situation? Animal Behaviour 81:683-689.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.12.007
  23. Dunlap, A.S., MacCormick, H., McLinn, C.M., Scott, M. and Kerr, B. 2009. Why some memories do not last a lifetime: optimal long-term recall in changing environments. Behavioral Ecology 20: 1096-1105.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arp102
  24. Dunlap, A.S. & Stephens, D.W. 2009. Components of change in the evolution of learning and non-learning. Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 276: 3201-3208.  DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0602
  25. Stephens, D.W. & Dunlap, A.S. 2009. Why do animals make better choices in patch-leaving problems? Behavioral Processes 80: 252-260.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beproc.2008.11.014
  26. Stephens, D.W. and Dunlap, A.S. 2008. Foraging. In: Learning and Memory: A Comprehensive Reference. Byrne, J. Menzel, R. et al (Eds.), Oxford: Elsevier Ltd. pp 365-383.
  27. Henly, S., Ostdiek, A., Blackwell, E., Knutie, S., Dunlap, A.S., and Stephens, D.W. 2008. The discounting-by-interruptions hypothesis: model and experiment. Behavioral Ecology 19:154-162.  https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arm110
  28. Dunlap, A.S., Chen, B., Bednekoff, P., Greene, T., and Balda, R.P. 2006. A state dependent sex difference in spatial memory in pinyon jays (Gymnorhinus cyanocephalus): mated females forget as predicted by natural history. Animal Behaviour 72: 401-411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2006.01.015
  29. Mech, S.G., Dunlap, A.S., and Wolff, J.O. 2003. Female prairie voles do not choose males based on their frequency of scent marking. Behavioral Processes 61: 101-108.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00128-6
  30. Wolff, J.O., Mech, S.G., Dunlap, A.S., and Hodges, K.E. 2002. Multi-male mating by paired and unpaired female prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster). Behaviour 139: 1147-1160. DOI: 10.1163/15685390260437308
  31. Wolff, J.O. and Dunlap, A.S. 2002. Multiple male mating, probability of conception, and litter size in the prairie vole (Microtus ochrogaster). Behavioral Processes 58: 105-110.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(02)00022-0
  32. Wolff, J.O., Dunlap, A.S., and Ritchart, E. 2001. Female prairie voles and meadow voles do not suppress reproduction in their daughters. Behavioral Processes 55: 157-162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-6357(01)00176-0